Latest USCIS Processing Times for Form I-485

WHAT ARE THE PROCESSING TIMES FOR FORM I-485?

Form I-485 Processing Times per USCIS Field Office. ‘Low’ and ‘High’ updated monthly by USCIS (Last Update May 1st, 2019). ‘Case Inquiry Date’ updated daily by USCIS. Rankings done by Immigration Planner based on performance since June 2018.
USCIS Field Office
Low
High
Ranking
Analysis
Case Inquiry Date
Agana GU1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Albany NY1122.531Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Albuquerque NM1122.534Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Anchorage AK1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Atlanta GA121879Low: Unstable (between 12 and 16.5 months). High: Unstable (between 18 and 35 months).Nov 25, 2017
Baltimore MD10.530.583Low: Unstable (between 9.5 and 18 months). High: Unstable (between 18.5 and 42 months).Nov 23, 2016
Boise ID1122.566Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 14.5 months). High: Stable (between 20 and 30.5 months).Jul 20, 2017
Boston MA6.52113Low: Unstable (between 4.5 and 11 months). High: Unstable (between 11.5 and 24.5 months).Sep 3, 2017
Brooklyn NY202288Low: Unstable (between 13.5 and 20.5 months). High: Unstable (between 22 and 35 months).Jul 30, 2017
Buffalo NY12.522.562Low: Stable (between 8 and 12.5 months). High: Stable (between 15 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Charleston SC1122.564Low: Stable (between 7 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 13.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Charlotte Amalie VI1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Charlotte NC7.516.511Low: Stable (between 7 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 16 and 23.5 months).Jan 6, 2018
Chicago IL10.531.581Low: Stable (between 5 and 13.5 months). High: Stable (between 25.5 and 36 months).Oct 25, 2016
Christiansted VI1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Cincinnati OH1122.527Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Cleveland OH1122.523Low: Unstable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Unstable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Columbus OH1122.557Low: Stable (between 7.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 19 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Dallas TX172276Low: Stable (between 17 and 19 months). High: Stable (between 21.5 and 29 months).Jul 25, 2017
Denver CO6.524.569Low: Stable (between 6.5 and 15.5 months). High: Stable (between 20.5 and 30 months).May 23, 2017
Des Moines IA1122.541Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Detroit MI7.515.54Low: Stable (between 6 and 10.5 months). High: Stable (between 14 and 23.5 months).Feb 17, 2018
El Paso TX61710Low: Stable (between 6 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 15 and 24 months).Jan 3, 2018
Fort Myers FL1122.549Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Fort Smith AR1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Fresno CA817.514Low: Unstable (between 6.5 and 10 months). High: Unstable (between 15.5 and 32.5 months).Dec 12, 2017
Greer SC1122.539Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Harlingen TX72360Low: Unstable (between 6.5 and 10.5 months). High: Unstable (between 20 and 32.5 months).Jul 4, 2017
Hartford CT10.52015Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 15 and 23.5 months).Oct 4, 2017
Helena MT1122.534Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Hialeah FL8.52119Low: Stable (between 8.5 and 14 months). High: Stable (between 16.5 and 22 months).Sep 3, 2017
Honolulu HI1122.556Low: Stable (between 9 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 18.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Houston TX17.52887Low: Stable (between 16.5 and 21.5 months). High: Stable (between 23 and 34 months).Feb 4, 2017
Imperial CA1122.527Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Indianapolis IN1122.552Low: Stable (between 5.5 and 11.5 months). High: Stable (between 17.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Jacksonville FL1122.521Low: Stable (between 6 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 13.5 and 23.5 months).Jul 20, 2017
Kansas City MO1122.554Low: Stable (between 5.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 20 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Kendall FL9.51855Low: Stable (between 9 and 14 months). High: Stable (between 16.5 and 29 months).Nov 29, 2017
Las Vegas NV141968Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 15.5 months). High: Stable (between 19 and 29 months).Oct 31, 2017
Lawrence MA71717Low: Unstable (between 6 and 11.5 months). High: Unstable (between 12.5 and 23.5 months).Dec 30, 2017
Long Island NY92871Low: Stable (between 9 and 11.5 months). High: Stable (between 26 and 31.5 months).Feb 1, 2017
Los Angeles CA111780Low: Unstable (between 4 and 16 months). High: Unstable (between 17 and 35.5 months).Jan 3, 2018
Los Angeles County CA121877Low: Unstable (between 12 and 13.5 months). High: Unstable (between 18 and 35 months).Nov 29, 2017
Louisville KY1122.529Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Manchester NH1122.525Low: Unstable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Unstable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Memphis TN1122.522Low: Stable (between 6.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 16.5 and 23.5 months).Jul 20, 2017
Miami FL1122.550Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Milwaukee WI10.52459Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 14 months). High: Stable (between 20.5 and 29 months).May 30, 2017
Minneapolis-St. Paul MN15.52874Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 17 months). High: Stable (between 23 and 31 months).Feb 6, 2017
Montgomery AL8.52153Low: Stable (between 8.5 and 14 months). High: Stable (between 16.5 and 27 months).Aug 26, 2017
Mount Laurel NJ915.57Low: Stable (between 8.5 and 11 months). High: Stable (between 15 and 23 months).Feb 8, 2018
Nashville TN1122.5#N/A#N/AJul 20, 2017
Newark NJ10.52273Low: Unstable (between 14 and 20 months). High: Unstable (between 26 and 34 months).Jul 25, 2017
New Orleans LA1122.563Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 15 months). High: Stable (between 18 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
New York City NY2030.585Low: Unstable (between 14 and 20 months). High: Unstable (between 26 and 34 months).Nov 22, 2016
Norfolk VA102251Low: Stable (between 9.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 19.5 and 29 months).Jul 29, 2017
Oakland Park FL2124.586Low: Stable (between 11 and 22 months). High: Stable (between 23 and 34.5 months).May 13, 2017
Oklahoma City OK1122.516Low: Stable (between 6 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 15.5 and 23.5 months).Jul 20, 2017
Omaha NE1122.532Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Orlando FL11.51867Low: Stable (between 7.5 and 16.5 months). High: Stable (between 18 and 29 months).Nov 21, 2017
Philadelphia PA1223.570Low: Unstable (between 9.5 and 13.5 months). High: Unstable (between 19.5 and 33 months).Jun 19, 2017
Phoenix AZ202278Low: Unstable (between 8.5 and 20 months). High: Unstable (between 17.5 and 32 months).Jul 30, 2017
Pittsburgh PA1122.524Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Portland ME1122.525Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Portland OR71818Low: Unstable (between 6 and 12 months). High: Unstable (between 14 and 33.5 months).Nov 29, 2017
Providence RI1122.520Low: Unstable (between 6 and 12 months). High: Unstable (between 14 and 23.5 months).Jul 20, 2017
Queens NY8.52261Low: Stable (between 4 and 14 months). High: Stable (between 19.5 and 25.5 months).Jul 29, 2017
Raleigh NC7.5235Low: Unstable (between 6 and 11.5 months). High: Unstable (between 12.5 and 23 months).Jun 25, 2017
Reno NV1122.539Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Sacramento CA91812Low: Stable (between 8 and 11.5 months). High: Stable (between 17 and 24.5 months).Dec 4, 2017
Saint Albans VT1122.548Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Saint Louis MO1122.534Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Salt Lake City UT1122.542Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
San Antonio TX7172Low: Stable (between 7 and 11 months). High: Stable (between 15 and 19.5 months).Dec 27, 2017
San Bernardino CA6169Low: Unstable (between 6 and 10.5 months). High: Unstable (between 14.5 and 31.5 months).Feb 2, 2018
San Diego CA7171Low: Stable (between 5.5 and 10.5 months). High: Stable (between 11 and 21.5 months).Dec 29, 2017
San Fernando Valley CA172782Low: Unstable (between 12.5 and 17 months). High: Unstable (between 18.5 and 35.5 months).Feb 24, 2017
San Francisco CA192184Low: Unstable (between 11 and 19 months). High: Unstable (between 20 and 35.5 months).Sep 5, 2017
San Jose CA10.519.565Low: Unstable (between 7 and 12.5 months). High: Unstable (between 19 and 31 months).Oct 21, 2017
San Juan PR1122.538Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Santa Ana CA13.52175Low: Unstable (between 11 and 15.5 months). High: Unstable (between 21 and 34 months).Sep 1, 2017
Seattle WA172172Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 17 months). High: Stable (between 19 and 29 months).Sep 2, 2017
Spokane WA1122.534Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Tampa FL9233Low: Stable (between 6 and 9 months). High: Stable (between 14.5 and 23 months).Jun 28, 2017
Tucson AZ815.558Low: Unstable (between 5.5 and 12 months). High: Unstable (between 12.5 and 29 months).Feb 14, 2018
Washington DC8196Low: Stable (between 8 and 11.5 months). High: Stable (between 17 and 20 months).Nov 4, 2017
West Palm Beach FL8.5188Low: Stable (between 8.5 and 12.5 months). High: Stable (between 16.5 and 21 months).Nov 28, 2017
Wichita KS1122.532Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
Yakima WA1122.529Low: Stable (between 10.5 and 12 months). High: Stable (between 22.5 and 29 months).Jul 20, 2017
  • ‘Low’ is the low-end of the range communicated by USCIS for the Field Office, expressed in ‘months’. It is the ‘best-case’ scenario. It means that USCIS makes a decision (following the Interview) on 50% of the filed I-485s within the ‘low’ number of months;
  • ‘High’ is the high-end, the ‘worst-case’ scenario, the time its takes USCIS to make a decision on 93% of I-485s it received.
  • If it takes longer for you than the ‘High’, then it means that the Receipt Date of your I-485 is before the ‘Case Inquiry Date’ and that you are allowed to get in touch with USCIS.
  • The data is refreshed and updated every morning (Eastern Time of the United States), because certain elements, such as the ‘Case Inquiry Dates’ are updated every day.
  • The data provided is exclusively for Family I-485 (not Employment).

Get a detailed, personalized I-485 timeline using the Processing Times that apply to you (based on your zip code)

Immigration Planner Web Forms

What’s different about Form I-485 Processing Times?
Form I-485 is one of the few forms (along with Forms I-751, I-90, and N-400) to benefit from the new USCIS Processing Times methodology rolled out in April 2018, which means that:

  • They better reflect the time it takes applicants to get an answer on their I-485 (not USCIS ‘backlog’ like before);
  • They are updated more regularly (almost every month, compared to every 3 months before);
  • It communicates clearly, through the ‘Case Inquiry Date’, whether the applicant is allowed to get in touch with USCIS because it is taking too long.

Which immigration forms have new processing times?

Form I-485 (adjust status), Form I-751 (remove conditions on a two-year green card obtained though marriage), Form I-90 (renew a 10-year green cards), N-400 (naturalize to acquire U.S. citizenship).


Why the change?

The processing times displayed by USCIS have been unhelpful to applicants for years. The goal is to get relevant information to applicants.


Does that mean that USCIS will process applications faster?

Unfortunately the answer is no. USCIS changed the way they will communicate about their process in the future, but they have not changed the process itself.

What do the new processing times mean?

The processing times now display an ‘Estimated Time Range’ in months for each of the four forms, and for each USCIS Service Center and each USCIS Field Office. Here is an example for the Boston Field Office for all forms I-485 (family and employment):

USCIS General Processing Time

Our first recommendation is, when applicable, to look at the more specific range at the bottom of the page. Here, we will focus on family-based I-485s:

USCIS Family and Employment Processing Time

This means that, for family-based I-485s, starting with the date the I-485 is filed:

  • 50% of the I-485 are adjudicated within 7 months of their filing
  • 93% of the I-485 are adjudicated within 18 months of their filing

What about the ‘Case Inquiry Date’?

What USCIS is essentially saying is that, if you are part of the 7% that are beyond the high range of the processing times, you can get in touch with them through an ‘outside of processing time’ request. In the Boston Field Office, for family-based I-485s, you can submit a request if you submitted your I-485 before October 10th, 2016:

USCIS Case Inquiry Date


How often are the USCIS processing times updated by USCIS?

USCIS is updating the processing times every month (as opposed to every 3 months in the ‘old’ approach). These are the dates of the last 6 updates of the I-485 processing times:

  • June 1st, 2018
  • July 7th, 2018
  • August 2nd, 2018
  • August 29th, 2018
  • September 28th, 2018
  • November 8th, 2018
  • December 19th, 2018
  • January 28th, 2019
  • March 13th, 2019
  • May 1st, 2019

The Case Inquiry Date is said to be ‘rolling’: once the processing times are updated for a given month, the Case Inquiry Date progresses automatically by one day, every day.

What about the other forms, including Form I-130?

This is a ‘pilot’, so a trial based on which USCIS says they will gather feedback, adjust their methodology if need be, and then extend to other forms. The calendar associated with a broader rollout is not known.

The forms that are not part of the pilot are now displaying a range. The range is made of the old date and the old date + 30%. Because the ‘old’ date is still computed using the ‘old’ backlog-driven methodology, this is not an improvement as much as a vague attempt at managing applicants’ expectations.


What do the Processing Times released by USCIS for family I-485s tell you?

Immigration Planner identified the following USCIS Field Offices with the fastest (and ‘stable’) I-485 processing times. Last updated in May 2019:

  • San Diego CA
  • San Antonio TX
  • Tampa FL
  • Detroit MI
  • Raleigh NC
  • Washington DC
  • Mount Laurel NJ
  • West Palm Beach FL
  • San Bernardino CA
  • El Paso TX

What do the Case Interview Dates released by USCIS for family I-485s tell you?

The ‘Case Inquiry Date’ is derived from the ‘high’ (or 93% completion). The issue here is that the ‘high’ can change a lot from one month to the next, changing in turn the ‘Case Inquiry Date’. By how much? Generally by 2 months or less. But note that during the last update 25 USCIS Field Offices (out of 88) had a change in the ‘high’ of 3 months or more.

What is Immigration Planner’s preliminary analysis of the new approach?

Like many, we are delighted that USCIS is tackling the processing time issue and we will certainly provide our feedback and the one of our community to USCIS. This is our current assessment:

  • The ‘Case Inquiry Date’ is an improvement, because it is clear and actionable by applicants.
  • Focusing more specifically on Form I-485, the new processing time range is an improvement but its impact is currently reduced by the following factors:
    • The filing date of Form I-485 for some applicants has been dictated by the ‘Filing Date’ of the Visa Bulletin, when the actual adjudication is guided by the ‘Final Action Date’ of the Visa Bulletin. As a result, it seems that the processing time range could be materially impacted by the fluctuations of the ‘distance’ between Filing and Action Dates.
    • The computations include the time associated with Request for Evidence (RFE) for applicants who receive one. The numbers would be more meaningful to applicants if processing times without RFE were known, and separate numbers associated with the impact of RFEs were communicated.
    • The computations are based only on last month’s completion. Such a small sample size might inflate volatility, although it is hard to say at this point.
  • The new ‘range’ using the ‘old’ methodology for forms not part of the pilot is not convincing at all. It is simply artificially broadening a range, acknowledging that the old approach lead applicants to be too optimistic because they misunderstood the data.
  • USCIS is using different percentages in different situation. For instance, the ‘personalized’ processing time accessible to applicants through myUSCIS will be based on the time it takes for 80% of the applications to be adjudicated. 80% is neither the 50% or the 93% that is used for USCIS Offices. We are not saying this is a bad idea, but the rationale behind the choice is not completely clear. Traditionally, USCIS would first communicate the average processing time for all applicants and then communicate the extent of the ‘dispersion’ around that average.

Why now?

The processing times displayed by USCIS have been unhelpful to applicants for years. The dates given by USCIS were understood by applicants as the priority date of of the case currently being reviewed by a USCIS Office when in fact they were an indication of the backlog of pending applications.

DHSThe shortcomings of the USCIS system have been pointed out by multiple reports emanating from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the CIS Ombudsman starting more than a decade ago.When yet another report by the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued in March 2018 underscored the deficiencies, USCIS might have felt it was time to start acting.

USCIS Resources

Get Case Processing Times

Check Case Status

Case Inquiry

Adjustment of Status

Concurrent Filing

Save time and prevent issues. Do concurrent filing using Immigration Planner.